Thanks Timesonline.co.uk:

“It’s an issue at the forefront of American politic discourse this past week: Hillary Clinton’s cleavage.
Robin Givhan, a fashion writer for the Washington Post, wrote about Clinton’s appearance on C-SPAN2, a cable television network that airs government proceedings, as the presidential candidate talked about the cost of higher education. But the focus of the Post a shadowy bit of cleavage. article wasn’t schoolbooks; it was Clinton’s pink jacket, black shirt with slight v-neck and what is evident at closer scrutiny,
“It was startling to see that small acknowledgment of sexuality and femininity peeking out of the conservative,” Givhan wrote, going on to compare it to catching a man with his fly unzipped. “To display cleavage in a setting that does not involve cocktails and hors d’oeuvres is a provocation,” although the writer seemingly took issue not with the cleavage itself but that it wasn’t as up-front and dramatic as that displayed by the new British Home Secretary Jacqui Smith (remarked upon in the blogosphere at the time with comments such as “Could someone tell Jacqui Smith that when she is giving a stern speech about terrorist dangers . . . it might not be such a good idea to show so much cleavage . . . it was inappropriate and unprofessional”).”
Good for the Clinton Campaign:
“The story has even been taken up by the Clinton campaign itself, in a fundraising e-mail that went out to supporters saying, “Frankly, focusing on women’s bodies instead of their ideas is insulting” and urging readers to “Take a stand against this kind of coarseness and pettiness in American culture. And take a stand for Hillary, the most experienced, most qualified candidate running for president.—
Wow…
Does anyone else REALIZE that men can walk around shirtless, on the street in the day time, but a shit storm hits anytime a women (who isn’t stereotypically “hot”) shows a bit.
It pisses me off… and it should piss you off too!















